2 replies to this topic

[Johnny Polaris]

The #1 tiebreaker criteria states: 1. The fewer number of games played (i.e., superior points percentage)

I understand points, but the fewer number of games played has me perplexed. Anyone?

Also did not realize shootout wins do not count in the "greater number of games won" criterion. Yet another chink in the gimmick.

[YzerFan19]

Johnny Polaris, on April 8 2011, 8:01 AM, said:

The #1 tiebreaker criteria states: 1. The fewer number of games played (i.e., superior points percentage)

I understand points, but the fewer number of games played has me perplexed. Anyone?

I don't think that applies at the end of the season, only in mid-season. End of season, everyone's played 82 games.

Johnny Polaris, on April 8 2011, 8:01 AM, said:

Also did not realize shootout wins do not count in the "greater number of games won" criterion. Yet another chink in the gimmick.

FSD has been harping on it for the last month, how did you miss it?

[Johnny Polaris]

YzerFan19, on April 8 2011, 11:18 AM, said:

Johnny Polaris, on April 8 2011, 8:01 AM, said:

The #1 tiebreaker criteria states: 1. The fewer number of games played (i.e., superior points percentage)

I understand points, but the fewer number of games played has me perplexed. Anyone?

I don't think that applies at the end of the season, only in mid-season. End of season, everyone's played 82 games.

Johnny Polaris, on April 8 2011, 8:01 AM, said:

Also did not realize shootout wins do not count in the "greater number of games won" criterion. Yet another chink in the gimmick.

FSD has been harping on it for the last month, how did you miss it?

Must have been all that cough syrup I drank last month