Red Wings @ Flames - Game 4 - 4/19
#1
Posted April 18, 2007 - 08:19 PM
#2
Posted April 19, 2007 - 08:31 AM
If I'm Babcock, I take Samuelsson out, bump up Bertuzzi, and put Hudler back in. Sorry catmandu, I know Sammy's your favorite, but he hasn't been getting it done.
#3
Posted April 19, 2007 - 10:28 AM
#4
Posted April 19, 2007 - 12:54 PM
The buzz for this game seems to be about whether or not Bertuzzi will get bumped up to the second line with Robert Lang and Kyle Calder. GorillaCrouch has a bit on that, as does the News.
If I'm Babcock, I take Samuelsson out, bump up Bertuzzi, and put Hudler back in. Sorry catmandu, I know Sammy's your favorite, but he hasn't been getting it done.
I agree . . . and if I've offended anyone by complaining about LANG, cuz he's a favorite
#5
Posted April 19, 2007 - 02:41 PM
#6
Posted April 19, 2007 - 05:20 PM
The last time they lost to leave a series tied at two was in 2004 against Nashville, when the Predators blanked Detroit 3-0 to come back from being two games down. The Red Wings would go on to win that series, 4-2.
#7
Posted April 19, 2007 - 08:49 PM
Anyone surprised that Robert Lang had a giveaway on his first shift?
#8
Posted April 19, 2007 - 08:52 PM
Babcock should put Osgood in. Hasek's too busy acting, not playing goal.
Nevermind, we get another reply that shows just as much contact was made there as was when Calder hit Kipper on Tuesday. Way to be consistant, refs. What was different between the two hits? The color of the jerseys.
#9
Posted April 19, 2007 - 09:04 PM
#10
Posted April 19, 2007 - 09:20 PM
Kipper seemed human on the Franzen goal, Wings need to get shots on net.
#11
Posted April 19, 2007 - 09:51 PM
f*cking christ.
#12
Posted April 19, 2007 - 09:57 PM
It's always seen as making excuses if you blame the refs but this game is not supposed to be such that you have to beat both the other team and the refs.
#13
Posted April 19, 2007 - 10:08 PM
I like the big guy getting p*ssed now! Bertuzzi should whip some asses tonight.
#14
Posted April 19, 2007 - 10:28 PM
#15
Posted April 19, 2007 - 10:28 PM
He said something I was going to mention but was too p*ssed off to, the Wings really did control the play pretty well in the second period when they weren't killing off ridiculous penalties. I added the second part, he didn't call them ridiculous, but that would have been cool.
#16
Posted April 19, 2007 - 10:37 PM
#17
Posted April 19, 2007 - 10:41 PM
I'll just sum it up by saying this. Calgary is beating the Detroit Red Wings. They are winning the scrums. They are putting more people in front of Hasek. The Wings on the other hand are NOT putting people in front Kiprusoff. How many times has Schneider and Lidstrom fired the puck in, and there were no Wing in front of Kiprusoff. Shall I mention the POWER PLAY ... The Wings have had NONE. The Wings power play, which has been sick for weeks now, is/has been a huge problem. If the WINGS lose the series, it will be the REASON why they do. Making their PP an even bigger problem is Calgary's PK AND their PP. NAH.... bitch all you want about the REFS ... Its the WINGS allowing Calgary to beat them. I don't care how much BABCOCK jockeys the lines .... if the WINGS aren't up to taking back the series, its over with.
Well, yeah the Wings need to do this and do that, but how is it possible for the emotion of a team to move forward when you aren't getting a square shake. It's like you at work, if someone is p*ssing you off and continues to get favor over you, how well do you concentrate about your job?
Nah, your summation is blanketed with remorse of a wanna go against the grain average joe bag of donuts!
Go Wings, and we'll win this sucker tonight!
#18
Posted April 19, 2007 - 10:54 PM
Of course that's too much to expect.
#19
Posted April 19, 2007 - 10:59 PM
#20
Posted April 19, 2007 - 11:06 PM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users













